Today I was looking at a web site which sold leather belts — the kind for Real Men. You know the kind: big, hefty belts made to hold guns, not just pants.
One type of belt was touted as being made of “bull” leather, not just “cow” leather, marketing this as being “better” because the bull is full of testosterone, which (according to the web site, but not any other source I can find online) makes for better leather. I had a question here: one cannot keep mass amounts of bulls easily. They fight, and they are dangerous. Where is the store behind this web site getting a bunch of bull skins to make these belts? Who is keeping bulls to maturity and then skinning them? And what are they going to do with all that testosterone-tainted meat afterwards? (Testosterone makes the meat darker and less desirable.)
Perhaps they are just using regular leather — even castrated steers are regularly treated with synthetic testosterone to improve meat yield.
The same company also makes “elephant belts”, which to my horror are made from actual elephant skin. The site insists they deal only with “legal importers” of elephant hide, which led me to wonder: Where do you find a “legal importer” of parts of an animal it is illegal to kill? This one surprised me: it appears to be legal to hunt elephants, provided you have the right permits, at least in some parts of Africa, and in theory the “tourism” trade that’s generating is good for the locals and even, possibly, in some roundabout way, the elephants. Um, that’s great…maybe…but I’m still not buying a belt made of elephant skin.
On a related note, the other day I was at a zoo which had a “touch tank” full of dogfish sharks, and it occurred to me that the zoo probably did not have its own dog shark breeding operation. Where might be the easiest place for a facility to get large quantities of a shark bred for “animal fodder, fertilizer, and research”?
I’ve walked past “touch tanks” for more than thirty years. Only now am I wondering where they get all these animals (and it seems likely they have high turnover in those tanks). A facility at which I worked once (against their own better judgement) bought display animals from a fur farm. Where is your local zoo getting their critters, and sending their surplus? Where is your “legal supplier” of elephant skin getting their material? It’s just an important question to keep in mind: what other industry may I be indirectly supporting by purchasing this product?
Posted in consumerism, idiocy, zoos
Tagged animal products, animal sourcing, animal suppliers, beef, belts, castration, cattle, consumerism, dog shark, elephants, hunting, leather, touch tank
Today’s water-cooler article (here passed around by the Huffington Post) concerns an undercover video from the group Mercy For Animals (whose web site is usually mercyforanimals.org, but right now it’s redirecting to walmartcruelty.com, which features the original video). The video, taken at Christensen Farms — or, rather, at one of Christensen Farms’ many subsidiary farms — shows horrific, awful things: sows confined in tiny, body-sized crates, like those used for veal calves; pigs and piglets with untreated, open sores and wounds; piglets being “euthanized” by what the farm — and the industry — euphemistically refers to as “blunt trauma” — i.e., by being swung by their hind legs and slammed into the floor head-first; and newborn piglets having their tails docked — and being castrated — with dull clippers, and without anesthesia.
What gets me is the quote from the Official Industry Representative:
“We have reviewed the video and have noted no exceptions to our company procedures or industry.” — Christensen Farms chief executive, Robert Christensen
And it’s entirely true. There’s not a thing in that video that isn’t an official pork industry procedure. Check it out — here’s the National Pork Board “Swine Care Handbook“:
- “Stalls allow the sow to stand, lie, eat and drink, but may not allow them to turn around… Varying sizes of gestation stalls can be used without negatively affecting welfare… Sows may be penned in farrowing stalls from late gestation until weaning of the piglets.” (pg 8)
- After birth, the following procedures may be performed on piglets: Clipping needle teeth; tail docking; ear notching; castration. Note that only piglets older than 14 days of age “should” receive anesthetics for these procedures. (pg 9-10)
- Under Euthanasia, they recommend the National Pork Board booklet, “On Farm Euthanasia of Swine – Options for the Producer“, which describes “blunt trauma” as “effective”, but notes that some people find it “aesthetically objectionable”. They also support “additional research on methods of neonatal euthanasia” — more ever-useful research into whether or not death is stressful. (pg 31)
- The general consensus seems to be that you have four options (pg 37) with a sick or injured pig: treat it (costs money); slaughter it for human consumption (you get paid normally for the carcass); cull it (“substandard slaughter”!) for pet food (you get less money for the carcass); or euthanize it (costs money, plus you have to dispose of the bits). Which do you think most meat producers will choose? Why pay to treat an injured animal when you can just kill it a little prematurely instead?
By not paying attention, we’ve created a space in which the things on that video are normal. They are USDA-approved. There are people who go to work every day, and cut the testicles out of squealing newborn piglets, and don’t think a thing of it, or, if they do, they don’t say anything for fear of being fired, because everyone else, especially the boss, is acting as though cutting the genitals off a conscious, unanesthetized piglet is appropriate behavior.
It’s possible to raise pigs in other ways. You can keep farrowing sows on pasture. You can use actual humane methods of euthanasia on culled piglets. You can even use anesthetic for castration, or not castrate the piglets at all. It’s just that it’s expensive to do it that way, and takes more time and effort, and that makes the meat cost more. So, ironically, we, the consumers, are actually in control of this process: As long as we’re willing to buy cheap pork (and other meat; this stuff isn’t just happening to pigs), producers will keep making it this way.
Posted in farming, meat processing, news, the Machine
Tagged 2012, bacon, blunt trauma, castration, Christiansen Farms, euthanasia, farming, farrowing crates, gestation stalls, Mercy for Animals, piglets, pigs, pork, tail docking, Wal-Mart
Two ranch-hands in Wyoming contracted Campylobacter jejuni infections via castrating lambs with their teeth.
I’m sure that, with some effort, they could have found some other way to do that.
This is one of those situations where I can see both with the eyes of an animal welfarist and with those of a ranch hand. The animal welfarist says, “Why are you doing that with no anesthetic?!? With your teeth? Why are you castrating them at all? You could just [insert high-maintenance management program, expensive castration alternative, or impossible immediate job switch here]!” The ranch hand says, “I have 1,600 sheep to do — can you imagine what it would cost, or how long it would take to anesthetize every one? Or to separate every adult ram, because they’ll fight?”
(Hate this problem? Ask why they have 1,600 baby sheep — they have such a large flock because they’ve been forced to expand their business to compete with even larger companies, to supply people who buy wool sweaters and ground lamb from enormous box stores. Buy local, and know what you’re buying.)
Either way, this is another one of those horrible consequences of exceeding the Monkeysphere — the sheep have become items, not individuals — and of assembly-lining the process. Forced to do something 1,600 times in a short period, the ranch hands found the fastest, lowest-effort way they could in which to do it. I notice that no-one checked to see if the sheep caught anything from their mouths!
Posted in farming, idiocy, news, the Machine
Tagged Campylobacter jejuni, castration, husbandry, news, ranch, sheep, teeth, Wyoming